A different sort of see sex differences in prominent spouse properties: The consequences out-of endorsing the standard women gender part
Jost, J. T., and you will Kay, A beneficial. C. (2005). Contact with benevolent sexism and you will complementary gender stereotypes: Outcomes to possess particular and you will diffuse kinds of system justification. J. People. Soc. Psychol. 88, 498–509. doi: -.step 3.498
Kay, A. C., Big date, Meters. V., Zanna, M. P., and you may Nussbaum, A great. D. (2013). The brand new insidious (and you will ironic) results of self-confident stereotypes. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. forty-two, 287–291. doi: /j.jesp.
Kervyn, N., Bergsieker, H. B., and you may Fiske, S. T. (2012). Brand new innuendo effect: Reading the good but inferring the latest bad. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. forty-eight, 77–85. doi: /j.jesp.
Kilianski, S. Age., and Rudman, L. A great. (1998). Interested in they both ways: Do female approve of benevolent sexism? Sex Spots 39, 333–352.
gelin Korece
Mae, L., and you can Carlston, D. Elizabeth. (2005). Hoist on your own petard: Whenever prejudiced responses is actually approved and you may backfire towards the sound system. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 41, 240–255. doi: /j.jesp.
Neely, J. H. (1976). Semantic priming and you will recovery from lexical memories: Proof getting facilitatory and inhibitory techniques. Continue Reading